Monday, July 11, 2011
London Borough of Richmond ... CCTV Smartcar Refunds
Let us not forget that the revenue derived by Richmond Council is UNLAWFUL income to which they are not entitled. Whilst their admission that their vehicles were incorrectly certified and refunds must be made requires praise along with some very laudible statements in their press release which I hope will serve as a reminder to other authorities that they are not above the law.
It is a requirement that they keep details of every financial transaction and therefore there should be no problem whatsoever contact everyone who has paid to advise them of the situation ... thus allowing them an opportunity 'to appeal' as Richmond claim their legal advice requires. That way they will not need to expend vast sums of money on press and media advertising.
Some cynics would perhaps suggest that a few adverts will result in significantly fewer refunds. I would like to believe that Richmond's intentions are honourable and an example that many others will be forced to follow in the coming months.
RICHMOND ON THAMES WEBSITE STATEMENT
Appeals for fines issued by camera cars (from March 2009 until April 2011)
At a Cabinet meeting on the 21 July, members will discuss a recommendation that Parking Charge Notices (PCNs) issued by the Council’s mobile camera cars from March 2009 until April 2011 are refunded. This is due to the cars being incorrectly certified during this time.
The PCNs issued fall outside the usual 28 day appeal period. Legal advice to the Council is that there is no need to repay parking charges outside the appeal period. However, as motorists had no way of knowing the charges were incorrectly levied, the Cabinet, in accordance with its Fair Parking policies, is being recommended to allow a special 3-month appeal period to enable motorists caught by the camera cars to request a refund. Appeals made on this basis would automatically be allowed. Unclaimed funds would be reinvested in parking, highway and footpath related schemes.
If the Cabinet Meeting approves this approach the Council will launch an extensive advertising campaign to contact motorists, letting them know how they can apply for a refund and what the precise starting point for the three month appeal window is. This process will not be in place until the Cabinet decision has been taken, so motorists are urged to wait before they contact the Council.
Adverts will be placed in the local newspapers and on the Council website after the likely Cabinet approval.
Please monitor the local media following the Cabinet Meeting on 21 July for further information on how to apply. In addition, please note that only Parking Charge Notices issued by the mobile camera cars and during the above dates will be entitled to a refund.
For more information see our recent press release
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2011
(51)
-
►
May
(10)
- If there are so many drivers failing to heed the s...
- No excuses. No TRO then give back the money
- Another council, another blunder ...
- Nice work if you can get it ...
- CCTV Not So SmartCar ticking timebomb
- Let's hope Richmond Council's Leader is true to hi...
- D'Oh! Council blunder has major financial implicat...
- Private Land ticket cancelled ... how many others ...
- Not so Smartcars? "Simples ...get approval"
- Council still Smarting ...
-
►
March
(11)
- Unduly Lenient Sentences
- Tipping Point for Britain's Motorists...The Scales...
- One rule for one ... and crocodile tears ...
- When the scales of justice start to tip ...
- Bailiff Action Petition ...
- Another ominous sign as the storm clouds gather ov...
- Parking Manager ... 'to secure and maximise income...
- Lester Cowling's Parking Battle ...
- More successes ... more cancellations ... praise f...
- The gathering of the clans ...
- Is this a traffic sign?
-
►
February
(12)
- Justice must be seen to be done ... and if it isn'...
- Prepare for the maelstrom ... Council officer forg...
- The death of parking enforcement in Devon? Is it t...
- Councils want signing 'dumbed-down'
- There are two ways to end clamping and towing ...
- Show me the money ...
- Parking 'Industry' now aware of the Court of Appea...
- The truth will out ...
- Herron v The Parking Adjudicator ... Order of the ...
- £1million spent by Sunderland in legal costs in eq...
- Perjury
-
►
May
(10)
0 comments:
Post a Comment