No excuses for Parking Managers or adjudicators now. The High Court (Moss v KPMG) and the Court of Appeal has clearly spelled out the requirements for signs to comply with TSRGD 2002.
I am led to believe that some Adjudicators are being a bit naughty still citing the decision of Justice Keith when appellants raise signing matters as a defence. Some parking departments also need to check their rejection letters as this matter may come with a nasty sting in the tail ... especially if they are aware of the non-compliance.
A further word of warning ... 'substantial compliance' fell a long time ago and perhaps some adjudicators should read the Ouseley decision in Moss v KPMG before attempting to elevate themselves powers to which they are not entitled.
To the people who are determined to see that justice prevails and the rotten apples exposed ... keep the information coming.
Herron wins permission to appeal in Sunderland CPZ case
Neil HerronParking campaigner Neil Herron has been granted permission to appeal against a High Court ruling regarding Sunderland's controlled parking zone (CPZ).
At the hearing last year Justice Bean dismissed Herron’s contention that a parking adjudicator had “erred in law” in his decision regarding the validity of the CPZ (PR June 2009).
- Justice must be seen to be done ... and if it isn'...
- Prepare for the maelstrom ... Council officer forg...
- The death of parking enforcement in Devon? Is it t...
- Councils want signing 'dumbed-down'
- There are two ways to end clamping and towing ...
- Show me the money ...
- Parking 'Industry' now aware of the Court of Appea...
- The truth will out ...
- Herron v The Parking Adjudicator ... Order of the ...
- £1million spent by Sunderland in legal costs in eq...
- Misconduct in Public Office
- ▼ February (12)
- ► 2010 (174)
- ► 2009 (115)
- ► 2008 (179)
- ► 2007 (210)
- ► 2006 (392)
- ► 2005 (445)