Rights to fight parking ticket
The Times
November 19, 2005
A pensioner aims to use the 1689 Bill of Rights to overturn a parking ticket. Robin de Crittenden, 67, from Willenhall, Wolverhampton, is fighting a £60 fine issued by Worcester City Council and has taken his case to the National Parking Adjudication Service. He believes that fines issued before conviction by a court are illegal under the Bill of Rights. The NPAS adjudicator reserved judgment on the case and is expected to notify the parties of his findings this month.
Friday, November 25, 2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2005
(445)
-
▼
November
(63)
- Rochdale Council given 7 day ultimatum...Give the ...
- Transport Committee and the Freedom of Lack of Inf...
- Daily Express Poll - the result
- The answers from Rochdale Council over their unlaw...
- Can this really be the end for the St George flag?
- The end of parking fines may be in sight
- Transport Committee puts its hands in its ears and...
- More news and press reports in brief
- Eu flag remains down
- We'll keep the Blue Flag Flying
- Press Release: Robin de Crittenden wins Appeal...n...
- Decittenden v Worcester...Decision to be announced
- Herron on TalkSport...Parking Fine Mess
- Opponents pole-axed in flag row
- Eurocrats ban our Red Ensign
- Wear Valley District Council...Unanimous decision ...
- Rights to fight parking ticket
- Press Release:- Wear Valley Council and that EU Flag
- Wear Valley Council desperate to fly the EU flag
- Zoe Hughes Column: Transport Committee...Dunwoody ...
- Road problems? You should have voted for the regio...
- Robin Decrittenden v Worcester City Council...Ques...
- NPAS Adjudicator Andrew Prickett to be given 'assi...
- Evidence Submission by Neil Herron to the Worceste...
- An end to Counties? Political Vandalism by New Labour
- Misfeasance in Public Office...Oh Dear, Sunderland...
- I'll prove parking fines are illegal...Report of t...
- Your details are sold to car park extortionists
- Robin Decrittenden v Worcester City Council...NPAS...
- Thousands of drivers face clamping for old offence...
- Another flag victory for the People's No Campaign
- North West Regional Assembly 'like a private club'
- Worcester Case report
- Press Release: Tribunal Hearing may expose Worcest...
- Notice of Event: Bill of Rights Hearing in Worcester
- Newcastle City Councillor attempts to intimidate c...
- The Guest who won't take 'No' for an answer
- Newcastle City Council in Parking Mess
- Transport Committee Caught 'Bang to Rights'
- Transport Committee 'adjusts' official document......
- Another admission by Sunderland...Now it's the Met...
- £133,000 spent by quango on HQ art
- Parking meters face new reverse
- Desperate attempts to legitimise unlawful EU Flag
- Conservatives speak...a year too late!
- Commons Transport Committee in Bill of Rights 'Cov...
- Zoe Hughes reports double clanger in Journal
- Wheel clamping drive signalled
- Press Release: Another Howler from Sunderland Coun...
- "Is Sunderland a City?" "Dunno. We can't find the ...
- Ever wanted to say 'We told you so?'
- Campaigners still saying 'No'
- No Campaign's Headlights Frighten Assembly Rabbit
- North East Assembly Savaged
- Attention Motorists: Parking Issue exposed on Toni...
- Getting under the skin of the europhiles
- Tonight with Trevor Mc Donald: Parking Fines Frida...
- Transport Committee:Further Submission: "Fine or P...
- North East Assembly's Notice to Quit
- Penalty Charge Fine Mess...now Portsmouth
- Sunderland Council's parking regime in meltdown
- North East Assembly Given Notice to Quit
- Rochdale MP asks Parking questions in the House of...
-
▼
November
(63)
1 comment:
Robin de Crittenden is right on the money.
Article 12 of the Bill of Rights Act, 1689 makes any attempt to impose a fine or forfeiture before conviction be a Court of Law illegal and void.
Article 9 of the same Act confers the power of Parliamentary Privilege on which parliamentarians rely every day on which they sit in the debating chambers.
What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.
NPAS is not a Court of Law (even though Magistrates and/or Judges may sit thereon) but a tribunal. This being the case it acts illegally if it attempts to impose any fine or forfeiture.
Let us not forget that the whole of parliamentary power comes from (so must defer to) the Bill of Rights Act, 1689.
One is innocent until proven guilty by a Court of Law. One must therefore always have the option of being heard before a Court and not be judged by some pettifogging bureaucrat.
Post a Comment