By Jill Sherman, The Times, Whitehall Editor
THE number of parking tickets handed out by local councils in England and Wales has shot up to nearly 2.5 million in a year, according to figures released yesterday.
A report from the National Parking Adjudication Service (NPAS), which monitors appeals forwarded by local councils, says that 300,000 more penalty notices were issued last year than in 2002. But the adjudicator received slightly fewer appeals during the same period. The 2003 figures show that councils issued 2.45 million tickets as against 2.13 million in 2002. There were 9,205 appeals against the notices, 0.2 per cent less than the previous year.
The document, which covers the 83 councils in England and Wales which are in the decriminalised parking enforcement scheme, shows big variations between different authorities. London is excluded from the report because it is covered by a different scheme. Some 66 per cent of appeals were upheld, including the two in five appeals not contested by councils.
But Caroline Sheppard, chief adjudicator for England and Wales, said that councils should be far more open with their parking ticket policy. “There is an urgent need for more transparency and accountability in the councils’ activities and it would be more informative for the public to have the whole picture,” she said.
“We believe the Government should require this information to be published each year, along with the councils’ parking accounts,” Ms Sheppard added. The data should include the number of penalty charges issued each year, the number paid at reduced penalty, the number of notices to owner issued, the number of representations received and accepted, the number of appeals lodged and the outcome of appeals and referrals to county courts.
Ms Sheppard suggested that this information should also be audited annually by the Audit Commission. “The Traffic Management Act proposes that high-performing councils should be able to widen the ring fence of their parking accounts to enable surpluses to be used for other council projects,” she said. “We believe that before this happens there should be standards set for civil traffic enforcement and that councils should achieve beacon status in these departments before the ring fence is widened to other projects.”
The report suggests that councils vary widely in their approach to mitigating circumstances. “Over the past ten years there has been consistent concern about councils’ approach to dealing with issues of discretion,” it says. In many ways councils could not be criticised in cases of compelling mitigation because they often did not possess the full facts. But the NPAS suggests that the new Traffic Management Act should include a clause allowing adjudicators the power to refer appropriate cases back to councils for reconsideration.
WHO ISSUED THE MOST
1. Birmingham 175,925
2. Brighton and Hove 160,546
3. Manchester 131,374
4. Liverpool 114,268
5. Nottingham 95,116
6. Reading 69,014
7. Northampton 65,580
8. Oxfordshire (Oxford) 56,970
9. Milton Keynes 56,150
10. Stoke-on-Trent 53,307
11. Medway 53,205
12. Sefton 51,378
13. Bristol 50,630
14. Plymouth 49,803
15. Southend-on-Sea 49,281
16. Portsmouth 49,169
17. Southampton 46,298
18. Luton 44,698
19. Bolton 42,592
20. Sandwell 42,043
Wednesday, March 02, 2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2005
(445)
-
▼
March
(88)
- Looks like no more wind from East Midlands Ass
- Regional responsibilities in the UK — and in the EU
- Where's Michael Howard's Balls?
- Bemused by brochure from 'rejected' assembly
- Regional assembly powers defended
- Freedom of Information Act
- Can't pay, won't pay
- NORTH-EAST ASSEMBLY
- De-selection leaves Labour in turmoil
- TRADER'S FIGHT OVER SCALES
- but will they withdraw and stop paying?
- European Commission buck passing begins
- Chris Foote Wood bends it like Beckham
- European Commission employees given a little 'remi...
- Copy of letter of letter from Miss H Buchan 13.01....
- Copy of Local Government Ombudsman’s report concer...
- Letter from Neil Herron to Newcastle City Council ...
- Letter from Ms. Valentine, Newcastle City Council ...
- Letter from Nasreen Ahktar, 15.02.05, Newcastle Ci...
- Letter from Neil Herron to Newcastle City Council ...
- Newcastle City Council Parking Tickets 'Illegal?'
- Local Authorities becoming worried over their 'ill...
- Open Letter to MacShane
- Straight answers required from North East Assembly...
- PRESS RELEASE FROM CORNISH TRADERS
- MEP's salary, expenses and allowances...and no vot...
- Labour elite join pre-election rush for safe seats
- City of Sunderland – Continuing Breach to/of Const...
- Party Lines - EU
- In a file note from the Parliament and Constitutio...
- The Jaws of the Trap Are Closing: The Courts and t...
- Sunderland Echo Letters - EU
- Conservative MEP Martin Callanan on the case of 'o...
- European Commission employee, John Jones, to be in...
- Bombshell for the Assemblies across the country
- Labour MP launches devastating attack on Blair...j...
- Unelected assembly branded waste of money
- Assemblies exempt from FoI Act
- Euro probe into abusive email
- FUTURE FOR REGIONAL ASSSEMBLIES
- Think again John
- Prescott's regionalisation programme by stealth be...
- North East Referendum mystery may be cleared up
- Prescott does not understand the word No
- Tories lead as even a 70% majority fails to bring...
- European Commission Vice President to get involved?
- "Is this the true face of the European Commission?"
- What Tony Says doesn't appear to be what Raynsford...
- Your Elected Representatives. Who are they?
- The response to Mr. Jones' abuse...the true face o...
- The true face of the Commission (part 2)
- The true face of the European Commission
- This man works for the European Union!
- Oh what a tangled web they weave!
- Will another one bite the dust?
- Heard this somewhere before?
- EU Constitution and the Metric Martyrs Judgment
- Law Reports:Summary of Judgments
- More turning against 'regions' plans
- "Another One Bites the Dust!"
- Postal Ballots Safe?
- Hidden cost of Prescott's regional folly
- Prevention of Terrorism Bill
- Prevention of Terrorism Bill - Letter
- Now they are desperate...One Gravy Train Derailed....
- Yes vote cost seven times more than a No
- Regional chiefs bid tackle 'transport bias'
- Figures reveal true cost of assembly vote
- Call to watchdog on assembly cash
- All the money in China couldn't have bought a Yes ...
- Vincent Grant fights back - and wins - over out of...
- Electoral Commission in Backbone contest with Jell...
- Response from NCP - PENALTY CHARGE NOTICE
- NORTH-EAST ASSEMBLY
- National Parking Adjudication Service is not a cou...
- National Parking Adjudication Service is not a cou...
- Is your Local Authority Part of the Decriminalised...
- 2½ million drivers pay penalty in the parking tick...
- Letter from Neil Herron to Ged Fitzgerald
- Acknowledgement from Ged Fitzgerald, 8th July 2004
- Response from Elaine Waugh, City Solicitor, 13th A...
- Response from Neil Herron to Elaine Waugh 24th Jan...
- City of Sunderland Council Reply
- Press Release Sandwell Council
- Prescott warned about 'No' vote
- Millions wasted on vote doomed to fail
- Parking Ticket Challenge Against Sunderland Council
- Research ignored
-
▼
March
(88)
No comments:
Post a Comment