Thursday, March 10, 2005

What Tony Says doesn't appear to be what Raynsford says

Regional rule

“Personally I am in favour of extending the mayoral system.

“People say it hasn’t worked but I disagree. I think you would find it quite hard to take it off any city that has got its mayor now.

“For the rest of us, it’s to try to get decision-making down to a local level. That is one of the reasons why we are giving parish councils and local neighbourhoods greater powers to influence their local policing and so on.

“People want to feel that their local voice is heard and that is where I think this will go now.

“The problem always with regional devolution in England is that in Wales and Scotland there is a clear national identity. In Northern Ireland people are aware Northern Ireland is an entity.

“[But] even in the Northwest and North-east, where you probably have a greater regional coherence than anywhere else, they don’t quite feel the same. And that’s the problem with it.

“We said it was a manifesto commitment, we gave people a shot at it, and I’m not saying if people came forward in the North-west or anywhere else and said we want a regional government then we wouldn’t facilitate that, but I don’t notice that happening a great deal at the moment.”

To read what Tony Says click here
To read what Raynsford says click here

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

What is all this about Scotland and Wales having clear "national identities" and England not having clear "regional identities"? People in England seem happy enough to gather under the St George's flag and recognise the country's existence. Why not a NATIONAL body for England, in line with Scotland? Why a continuation of the West Lothian Question, the new horrors of non-representative MPs, the Barnett Formula etc and continued efforts to chop the country up?
Scotland is diverse for its size. Why one rule for them, another for us? Oh, silly me, I forgot Scotland is Mr Blair's "proud, historic" heritage!

Blog Archive


only search Neil Herron Blog