Dear Sir / Madam,
I caught a small piece in the Journal (24.08.05)...Blyth Valley Council are going to start fining people £75 for leaving their bins in the streets.
Perhaps another 'partnership' such as Sunderland City Council's with NCP, we may see the creation of Bin Wardens loitering around street corners ready to issue fines to 'law breakers.'
A feature of this "new politics" which is becoming endemic throughout all sectors of administrative bureaucracy is the brushing aside of annoying legal details in the pursuit of increasing revenue.
Most people do not have the time or the will to challenge the administrative 'Goliath' and the reluctant capitulation breeds anger and resentment.
Why let the law and the people's fundamental rights get in the way?
However, more and more people are starting to say,"Wait a minute, do you actually have the legal authority to do what you are doing?"
The Metric Martyr's Judgment handed down in 2002 stated that certain Acts of Parliament, including the Bill of Rights, are constitutional and can only be repealed with express words.
The legislation upon which Blyth Valley Council are reliant will not have repealed that act. Therefore, "all grants and promises of fines and forfeitures before conviction are illegal and void." In laymans terms, conviction means before a court, not a council official. Therefore, no court, no fine.
This "arrogance of office" is out of control and rapidly losing the respect of the law abiding public who bear the cost. It appears as though government, local and national, is no longer there to serve but to rule, and increasingly in a draconian and financially punitive fashion.
However, there is other legislation in place, and Blyth Valley council should be reminded that if they wish to pursue alleged offenders they should do so through the courts in a proper and orderly manner.
Section 137 of the Highways Act, 1980, states," a person, without lawful authority or excuse, in any way wilfully obstructs the free passage along a highway he is guilty of an offence and liable to a fine not exceeding £50." Trouble is that Blyth Council know that their binmen would be in trouble and be 'an accessory to the fact,' as it is they who left the bins in the street in the first place!
Yours faithfully,
Neil Herron
12 Frederick Street
Sunderland
SR1 1NA.
0191 565 7143
Wednesday, August 24, 2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2005
(445)
-
▼
August
(41)
- NPAS...National Parking Adjucation Service is Inde...
- Highway Robbery...by Councils across the land
- Welcome to the Site...Sunderland Council
- The real reason for the EU's insistence on the UK ...
- Gunter sticks his twelve inch foot in it
- Hands of our pints, traders tell Brussels
- First of many refunds in Sunderland
- More questions for Sunderland Council...Who knew? ...
- Sunderland Council's Parking Regime Going Through ...
- Bob Rayner Response to Neil Herron's Letter of 29t...
- Letter to Sunderland City Solicitor Bob Rayner 29t...
- House of Common Library - Bill of Rights and Metri...
- Newcastle Journal, The Letters Editor
- National Parking Adjudication Service...on the record
- Yellow peril fines fiasco
- The Letters EditorDear Sir,I would like to first m...
- Parking Fines Gaffe
- Association of British Drivers agrees with Herron....
- Is it that obvious? Where is the money?
- Traffic wardens in 'Argos points for tickets' row
- They're paid to book you!
- Sunderland Council and NCP now admit to 78 offences
- Sunderland may have to repay £2m in parking penalties
- Cover up alleged over parking fines
- Council Accused of rank cover-up
- Another Sunderland Council/NCP Clanger
- Sunderland Council press release
- A Fine Mess
- House of Cards ready to fall?
- Drivers' Parking Ticket Victory
- Advice on setting up Traffic Regulation Orders
- Driven out by traffic wardens
- Sunderland Parking Regime About to Go Into Freefall
- Parking Tickets Could be Illegal
- Parking: Press Notice Houses of Parliament
- Herron Convicted! Another can of worms opens
- Times Letters...Regionalisation
- Neil launches fresh No campaign
- Excel Airways...XL Airways...Ex-Hell Airways
- Why it's nearly impossible to find a candle that s...
- English north-east: the big idea that Blair ignored
-
▼
August
(41)
4 comments:
Big Brother 6: Nominations and Veto #8
I don't like these episodes where they try to cram what would normally be placed into two separate ... The veto competition was a swimming one where people had to untie floating things with the HouseGuests' pics on them from the pool, run over to two tall tubes, and drop each HouseGuest next to their partner.
I did a bit of blog surfing when I came upon your nice blog.
Stil smoking, but you want to stop?
Quit smoking now Think of your health and stop smoking now.
"Herron Bin Loadin" Eh
;o)
.
A fantastic blog. Keep it up. Check out my site when you've time Wedding Photography Northampton UK It's just for local Wedding Photography Northampton UK
Kind of related to this ...
The first ever housing estate built in Telford (Sutton Hill) is, understandably, a bit of a layout disaster. It is full of alleyways, windy roads and paths and more than half the houses aren't even next to a road.
A few years ago, Telford & WQreking council introduced wheelie bins to Telford. They have eventually realised that the housing estates, Sutton Hill in particular, just don't mix with wheelie bins. They are nowhere near the road, the pavements are too narrow, etc.
The obvious solution would surely be to go back to proper bin collections from your garden? No. The Telford & Wrekin solution is to build wheelie bin collection compounds and force residents to drag their wheelie bins across the estate to one of the collection points.
Coming on top of a drop to fortnightly collections for rubbish bins (to allow garden rubbish bins to be collected in the intervening week) and an inflation busting rise in council tax year on year, it's a bit of a kick in the teeth. Particularly when you take into account that the estate is a slum and crime is out of control.
Post a Comment