Wednesday, November 10, 2004

Net closing. Assembly staff should start scanning the Guardian jobs section

Isolated by huge 'No' vote
Nov 10 2004
By Ross Smith,

The Journal

After last week's referendum gave a resounding 'no' to an elected regional assembly, Ross Smith asks if the man heading the unelected body for the North-East can still justify his job.


Stephen Barber is putting a brave face on it, but right now he is a man under fire.
Just minutes after plans for an elected assembly were dealt a crushing defeat by North-East voters last week, his own job was being called into question.
As director of the existing unelected assembly, opponents of regional government were instantly questioning whether his role retains any legitimacy in the wake of the referendum.

North East No Campaign director Neil Herron dug deep into his knowledge of opera to come up with the painful pun "Barber of s'Evil" for one press release.

It raised a smile from Mr Barber - but he knows that there is a serious message behind it.
A more friendly reaction came from the beleaguered Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott, who amid attacks from a reinvigorated Tory regions team, insisted the unelected bodies will continue. However, it may not, ultimately, be up to him.

North-East councils pay a five-figure subscription fee to sign up to the assembly on a voluntary basis, and, on Monday, some were already discussing pulling out.
But Mr Barber is defiant in his view that a regional body must remain in place.
He said: "We have to be clear what was the question they were being asked. We were being asked for a view on an assembly of a certain size, with a certain backing, with a certain set of powers.
"The clear message, I think, was people did not want something with more bureaucracy, more levels of government, perhaps did not want change in local government, something that was going to cost, with a new building, a new lot of politicians - the present assembly is none of those things.
"People have not been asked for a view on the present assembly, and to draw a link between the two is a bit tenuous and a bit mischievous on the part of some people."
But he admits very few people would be able to give a view on the unelected assembly, with many barely aware of its existence. Based at the Guildhall, the assembly, along with the linked Association of North East Councils, has for the past five years been a forum for building strategies which cut across local authority boundaries in the region.
It employs 28 staff, has 72 members drawn from local government, business trade unions, voluntary organisations and various public sector bodies, and runs at an annual cost of £2.2m.
Of that, £860,000 comes from subscriptions from councils, with the rest coming from central government. Mr Barber said: "If you say which buildings has the assembly put up, which roads has it built, you can't because you have to look at the finances the assembly has.
"But if you were to say in what ways has the assembly helped to shape government policy, I think in a whole number of ways. In the area of crime and community safety, in areas of health, there's now a level of debate in these two areas for example that was just literally not taking place before." Mr Barber is confident North-East council tax payers get value for money for the 50p-a-year they contribute to the assembly's running costs.

He expects some councils to question whether their subscription is one expenditure they can do without laying on tax payers next year.

He said: "Last year, 25 local authorities decided that they were going to continue to contribute. Some might well drop out. They might drop out for a whole range of reasons, we just need to wait and see.
"If an authority decides to leave the association and assembly, is the organisation weakened? Perhaps - it depends on the authority.
"But the agenda would still continue. We would have to fight. You can't suddenly stop reminding ministers about the North-South divide just because authority A or authority B isn't in membership."

Perhaps Mr Barber and Mr Prescott could share a bunker as the flak from the anti-regionalists keeps flying.

Tory Euro MP Martin Callanan said: "I respect Stephen, but he's talking nonsense. The voter shows people do not want regionally-based political structures. It flies in the face of that to continue with the regional agenda."

Mr Herron added: "Mr Barber's in an uncomfortable position. I don't think this organisation has got a very long lifespan."

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Of course Mr Barber and his staff should not go. The Regional Assembly must continue. There are two over-riding reasons for this:

(1) Where else would Mr Barber and his bureaucrats get a job? Their skills are not needed elsewhere, after all. It's only reasonable that the taxpayers of the North East should continue to pay for these people's mortgages, food, clothing, entertainments, cars, and hobbies. Otherwise they'd be on the dole, and much worse off. And that would be against the Human Rights Legislation, which states that all unelected bureaucrats must be publicly funded, not only for the lifestyles of their choice, but also for their lavish pensions (which ordinary people, if they could afford them, are now not allowed to do - see the latest Governement pensions limits legislation).

(2) Without Mr Barber and his people, who would the EU bureacrats talk to in the North East? And without being able to talk to Mr Barber, these EU-ites would not have anything to do, and that would never do. It's their right to be publicly funded to do nothing except talk to Mr Barber. By the way, don't think that London has anything to do with this. The Regional Assembly idea is all an EU thing. It comes straight from Brussels to the North East without touching the sides in London. Except that Mr Prescott is occasionally informed - after the fact - about what his EU bosses want him to say. But don't think that the EU Commission is anti-England - it's just that our shires, towns, cities and counties do not conform with their blueprint of an EU of "regions". It's England that too untidy for the charts in Brussels. So they're not anti-England, they just want to tidy up the mess in England, and if England gets swept away as well, then that would be a pity, but at least the land between Scotland, Wales and France would be tidier on their maps.

So long live the Regional Assemblies, and long live high taxation of working people to support useless bureaucrats and their EU masters, also useless leaches. Especially the unlected Commissars - oops sorry that should be Commissioners.

After all - is there an alternative any more in England? Does anyone care? Certainly I don't hear any politicians shouting - or even murmering. Maybe the politicians should get a new people. We can all move into the Atlantic - at least you don't get over-taxed when you're drowning.

Anonymous said...

you're missing the key point about the RAs and the EU. The keystone of the EU is the Structural Funding programme which aims to eliminate differences between the regions. This funding is distributed thro the regional agencies and by-passes Westminster, leaving Brussels in charge of "social and cohesion" as defined in the treaties.

However, it will never work properly until everyone uses the Euro and the EU has control of all taxation - see current moves to harmonise company taxation, VAT and the really big one - personal taxation.

Boy! if that ever happens then we're all finished!

Anonymous said...

Don't forget that the unelected RAs have already sucked up powers away from the elected County Councils in a number of activities,eg strategic planning. We want these powers restored to the authorities that are accountable to the elctorate not a self-appointed body.
From a supporter in the southwest

Anonymous said...

Neil

There is a great need to look carefully at the other component of the Regionalisation scam. That is the incedible things happening at Parish Level.

Quality Parishes.....grants of £15,000 per parish just to set up another beauracratic layer.

Training band-wagons with so many organisations struggling to get on that they have had to set up "training partnerships". Huge grants beinmg given.

Parish Councillor expense allowance schemes...with PAYE applied.

Qualification requirements for parish clerks. 25 (yes 25) x 1000 word assignment portfolios, to be marked by anonymous assessors many of whom do not even hold a qualification.

The National Association of Local Councils, previously a representative body for local councils, has become a large government quango, aiding and abetting Mr Thug Prescott in his regionalisation activities.

Parish Plans costing more and more tax payers money, only to be ignored by District and County Plans. More lucrative grants.

Parishes have been told to put up the precepts, double or treble if necessary to install the new regime.

Clerk's who traditionally worked from the dining room table in their home within the parish, for as little as £650 per annum, are now being bulldozed into regulatory employment, with PAYE, maternity leave, 6 weeks annual leave, and probably an office, for several thousand pounds per annum.

Freedom of Information Acts, Codes of Conduct, Declaration of Interests, Training, for rural Councillors of many years of voluntary service.

As one parish was advised by a NALC/CALC
"Officer"........"as a parish, comply or die"!

The financial impact created by "Lengthsman" schemes, "Parish Warden", Rural Transport schemes (already paid for by the chargepayer) are devastating small rural communities. This is a form of double taxation being imposed on parishes because someone spotted the fact that they are not "capped" in their spending, and that they are easy targets.

Can we not get the spotlight on these obscene rip offs? There is a dying tiger out there requiring help. Our Parish Councils are about to disappear.

Parish Clerks in most Counties are on e-mail. Their addresses can be obtained from the local Councils or CALC. Why not do a Parish survey?

I would help from my "office".

Anonymous said...

Let's not forget that this isn't just a North-East concern. We are I hope all fighting for the whole of England (and the rest of the UK) not to be governed by the EU. Whatever our political persuasions, these must be put aside for the sake of our country. Democracy is being taken away from us and the regional assemblies are part of that process. We all have to vote against the European Constitution if we ever manage to get a referendum.

Blog Archive


only search Neil Herron Blog