Tuesday, November 09, 2004

Prescott still doesn't get it!

BBC Online
8th November 2004
Prescott rules out regional polls

Read it here

Mr Prescott says he is not changing his beliefs of 30 yearsReferendums on regional assemblies have been ruled out in the near future by the deputy prime minister.
John Prescott told MPs last week's "no" vote in the North East meant plans to allow the assemblies would not go before Parliament this session.
The government would now not order new polls in the North West and Yorkshire and the Humber, he said.
His Tory shadow, Caroline Spelman, said the North East vote was a "humiliating defeat" for the government.
She argued the plans had been rejected because: "The people understood loud and clear that the assembly would not put one more doctor, teacher or policeman into service."

QUICK GUIDE
UK devolution

Liberal Democrat regions spokesman Ed Davey suggested the result might have been different if the government had promised the assembly more powers.
There was still a need for power to be devolved from Whitehall, he said, and more thinking was needed about the best way to do it.
But Mr Prescott insisted a lot had been achieved on devolution, pointing to the Welsh assembly, the Scottish Parliament, the London Assembly and regional development agencies.
But he insisted he was not giving up his beliefs of 30 years and said the devolution project would continue.
It's worth remembering the proposal for Welsh and Scottish devolution failed to win support in the first referendum in 1979
Mr Prescott
"We will devolve power down," he said.
"It's worth remembering the proposal for the Wales and Scottish devolution failed to win support in the first referendum in 1979 only for the situation to be reversed 20 years later in a new referendum."
With regard to the proposed referendums on assemblies in the North West, Yorkshire and Humber, Mr Prescott said the government had "reflected on" the North East result.
'Uncertainty'
The Electoral Commission watchdog has been asked to draw up a new model for postal ballots because of concerns about fraud in the postal vote in June's European and local elections.
The government has promised there will be no referendums in the other regions until the watchdog reports on all-postal ballots and draws up a new voting model.
Mr Prescott said that report would not be ready until September 2005, which was after the laws permitting such "sounding exercises" ran out in July 2005.
To avoid a "a long period of uncertainty" for the regions involved no orders for the polls would be laid, he added to jeers.

"No" campaigner John Elliott was delighted with the result
Earlier, former Cabinet minister Peter Mandelson suggested devolution plans would be presented in a different form if they returned.
"The people of the North East have had their say. It is an idea, in their view, whose time has gone, if it ever arrived.
"I happen to see an argument for it but the public don't embrace it and I don't think it is going to come back in that form."
The plan for a new assembly was voted down by 696,519 (78%) to 197,310 (22%) in the referendum on Thursday night.
Official figures showed 47.8% of the North East's 1.9 million voters took part in the all-postal assembly referendum.
The government believes elected assemblies would give a voice to regions distant from Westminster and return power to local people from the non-elected bodies that oversee many services.
But anti-regional assembly campaigners argued the new tier of government would be an expensive talking shop with very little real power.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

What we need is for wide-ranging decision-making powers to be returned to the existing local authorities in England, along with a return to the general principle that local services should be financed by local taxes, set by democratic local authorities. There would still need to be some equalisation payments transferred via London from rich areas to poor areas, but that would be the exception to the general rule that local councils should be financially independent of central government.

If we achieved that in England, people in Scotland and Wales would then want to enjoy the same local freedom, and they might even come to see the Scottish Parliament and Welsh Assembly as impediments.

Anonymous said...

They intend to keep the un-elected assemblies running.
May be we should call for a referendum to see if people want to be ruled by an un-elected assembly?.
It is up to councils now to pull out, they must look after the interests of rate payers first.
This should become an election issue.

Anonymous said...

Whilst I agree almost entirely with the comments made above, I'm a little concerned with this local taxation proposal.

I would have thought the 70% increase in Council Tax to be local taxation at full tilt (while easing off with money from Whitehall of course).

Jim, Wear Valley, Co. Durham

Anonymous said...

You cut national taxation by the amount that local taxation is increased, so the total tax is the same but less of it goes through London and more goes direct to the local authorities. A good start would be to reclaim business rates, which at present are collected by local councils but then go straight into a pot in London. The local tax need not be council tax. Some people suggest a local sales tax, that's worth thinking about.

Blog Archive


only search Neil Herron Blog