By David Jackman
EPPING Forest district councillors could be asked to vote on whether the district council should sever its ties with the controversial regional assembly.
The council has already voted in favour of asking Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott to abolish the body which has been making key decisions over plans for thousands of new homes across the region, including some 11,000 in the Epping Forest district.
But now, following a reported move by the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister to give the assemblies more power to decide on traveller sites in district council areas, Epping Forest Council leader John Knapman says it is time for the district council to reconsider its position.
Commenting on a national newspaper article that said the assemblies had been given the power to dictate to district councils how many sites should be allocated to travellers in their areas, Mr Knapman said: "This is unacceptable. Epping Forest Council is already examining its provision of sites for travellers and is actively considering where new sites need to be provided. That should be a decision for this council or Essex County Council. It's not a decision which should rest with the bureaucrats at Bury St Edmunds."
He added: "This has caused me to consider the council's position as far as maintaining its membership of the East of England Regional Assembly is concerned. I find it difficult to argue that we should continue to spend £12,000 a year in membership fees to a body which is being castigated by a large majority of councillors.
"I shall be discussing with members this view and am considering bringing a report to council that we withdraw from the East of England Regional Assembly."
The council, in the current financial year, paid over £10,000 in its subscription to the East of England Regional Assembly which, as already reported in your local Guardian, has an annual budget of some £2m yet meets only fully about twice a year.
Monday, February 07, 2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2005
(445)
-
▼
February
(45)
- Will this be the downfall of the assemblies?
- Leader of North East Assembly's Criminal Conviction
- Local Government Act 1972 - Section 143
- Local Government Act 1972 - Sections 137
- Local Government Act 1972-Sections 94, 95, 96
- Prevention of Terrorism Bill exposes Metric Martyr...
- How we voted no and meant yes
- Will the Terrorism Bill 'free' the Metric Martyrs?
- Another blunder by the Electoral Commission
- It was you who wrote Magna Carta, my Lords. And no...
- Dividing and ruling
- Inland Revenue Lawyers in Disarray
- Bill of Rights 1689 explained
- Metric Martyr's Stitch up explained
- New funding for assembly?
- An apology from BBC's Jeremy Vine
- Trouble at Mill...Wakefield Council acting illegally?
- REGIONAL ASSEMBLY
- Find your MEP
- Investigation: This man wants to hit BT with a bas...
- Pro Forma Letter to MEP's
- The Pensioners’ rallying cry should be: No link, n...
- Raising concerns over plans for homes
- BBC's Jeremy Vine Show drops Parking Ticket story
- Scathing report urges public inquiry to measure in...
- STAFF LEVELS AT ASSEMBLY REVEALED
- Legal twist exposes 'miscarriage of justice' for t...
- 'Talking shop' funds are cut
- Regions miss out on EU concessions
- REGIONAL ASSEMBLY
- Regional Assemblies
- Ringing endorsement for assembly by Government
- Devolution 'could spark EU power struggle'
- Bringing order to the regions, Paperclip policy ta...
- LEADER ANGERED BY POWER OF ASSEMBLY
- 400,000 homes in North face demolition
- Council set to pull plug on assembly
- FPB: Scrap ‘abject’ regional assemblies and save £23m
- 'In a Nutshell'...the Government's Dilemma £1billi...
- NORTH-EAST ASSEMBLY
- Prescott focuses on local level in U-turn
- People of the region were frightened by scare stories
- Tory wants Assembly out
- Parking Tickets...Administrative Bodies out of Con...
- Now it's starting to happen
-
▼
February
(45)
No comments:
Post a Comment