Just to give a flavour of the importance of the case to be heard before the High Court on the left is a document obtained under the Freedom of Information Act of a meeting which took place between officials from the Department for Transport, the Government Office for the North East and Sunderland City Council.
A lot of information on the reasons for the draftsmen of the TSRGD 2002 being so strict with the definition of a CPZ is still being 'witheld' but the content relating to the meeting is is pretty clear.
Monday, April 26, 2010
Controlled Parking Zones and the High Court case
Labels:
controlled parking zone,
CPZs,
judicial review,
neil herron
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(174)
-
▼
April
(20)
- Sunderland City Council ... 'A Nice Little Earner ...
- Who was the Council Officer who lied to the press ...
- Sunderland City Council Officers Lie to the Sunder...
- CPZ Test Case Required ... DfT says...
- Parking Enforcement in Sunderland ...
- Department for Transport Presentations on CPZs
- Sunderland created their CPZ in 1968 ...
- Controlled Parking Zones and the High Court case
- More refunds as the fightback continues ...
- The High Court Judicial Review ... Herron v The Pa...
- A message from a London Cabbie ...
- Law enforcement on the streets of Britain today ...
- Parking refunds due in Edinburgh ...
- Westminster's wardens to issue warnings ... want t...
- The face of Britain's parking enforcement ...
- The pressure mounts ...
- From the man of the people ...
- Where will the dam crack first ?
- PATAS puts TPT to shame ...
- Beware the night shift ...
-
▼
April
(20)
No comments:
Post a Comment