Friday, October 29, 2004

...and this man is an MP!

Every Thursday in the Evening Gazette.
You know best
Oct 28 2004
Edward Davey MP


The people of the North-east face an important choice now they've been asked to vote on a Regional Assembly.
The Liberal Democrats strongly support a Yes vote in the referendum, and I'd like to explain why.
We believe the people of the North-east know what's best for this area.

An assembly can make a difference to a region on things like jobs, housing and transport.
We agree with Labour on this Regional Assembly because we believe it's in the interests of local people. Only the Tories are opposed.

I'm pleased so many non-politicians are backing the "Yes" vote - like Brendan Foster and Suzannah Clarke - as well as local politicians like Ray Mallon, the mayor of Middlesbrough.
This proves the assembly is not just about more politicians talking: it's about people of the North-east making their own lives better.

It makes no sense that decisions about investments in key industries, major transport developments or regeneration schemes should be taken in London.
Why should somebody sitting at a desk in London take decisions about rail services between Saltburn and Stockton?

Devolution has strengthened the voice of Scotland, Wales and London and I believe it could do the same for the North-east.

When I visit the North-east, I am struck by two things.

First, I notice the real pride that people have in their community.

Second, I get a real sense that people in the region feel they are overlooked by the decision-makers in London.
And the North-east continues to face significant problems in creating good quality jobs, especially for its young people.

These things were brought home to me as I saw the results of an ICM poll on attitudes to a North East Assembly, with massive levels of support among the young.
Young people have their eye on the future and seem to be very positive about what an Assembly might achieve.

The old system where virtually all important decisions are taken in Westminster and Whitehall is outdated.
Liberal Democrats believe in trusting the people and have faith in the people of the North-east to run their own affairs.
A regional assembly can make a difference.
It could assist the regeneration of the Tees Valley and support developments such as that at Middlehaven.
It could help provide high quality training for young people.
It could tackle the region's health problems, particularly noticeable in the Tees Valley.

We are committed to using influence in Parliament to ensure that the legislation which will create an Assembly provides stronger powers than those currently on offer.
I am sure, for instance, that an Assembly will have substantial powers over transport, including the right to invest in road provision.
Like Ray Mallon, the Liberal Democrats are keen that a Regional Assembly will not be politics as usual.
It will be elected by proportional representation which will ensure that no one party or individual will dominate.
The No campaign is distinguished by the poverty of its ideas and the complete absence of any answers to the issues that face the Tees Valley.
I believe people have had enough of negative politics.
A Regional Assembly offers the chance for more decisions about the North-east to be made in the North-east.
Edward Davey MP is Liberal Democrat Shadow to John Prescott.

What do you think about this or any other issue?

If you would like us to consider your passionate views for Crossing the Tees then write to; Editor, Evening Gazette, Borough Road, Middlesbrough TS1 3AZ. Fax 01642 232014 or email editor@eveninggazette.co.uk

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

How can any one shadow prescott? prescott's shadow has been cast over all of England, sorry , the regions of Britain. Davey is just being loyal to his boss, Charles
"regional assemblies will challenge the very idea of England" Kennedy. Nothing to do with democracy for us like, Kennedy does not want English interference in the highlands and islands but wants to interfere in ours.

Anonymous said...

On "Question Time" a few years ago, Kennedy was asked whether he should be voting in the Commons on matters which only affected England. His response was that he would carry on doing so, until there was proper English devolution. Don't try to find the logic in that - there isn't any - but it said something about the man and his attitudes. Like most of those now controlling what is laughably described as the "Liberal Democrat" party, he came in as a Social Democrat, one of Roy Jenkins' band. Many of the true Liberals walked away, when their party was merged with the SDP. They still exist as a separate party.

Blog Archive


only search Neil Herron Blog