Tuesday, October 05, 2004

House of Commons Select Committee

To view the Written Evidence to the House of Commons Select Committee :

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister: Housing, Planning,Local Government and
the Regions - Written Evidence please click here

To view the well prepared evidence by NESNO please click here. It is disappointing that the author of the report could not turn up in person. One would assume that it was one of the NESNO team, and not William Guy Norton or Dominic Cummings who prepared the report. Judging from the NESNO website and the information on the site it appears that the draftsman of the report is not the same as the draftsman of the website. Please click here to see the NESNO website. I am sure clarification will be forthcoming.
Perhaps it was the same principle that was applied to the application to the Electoral Commission. NESNO Chairman John Elliott, has already confirmed that he did not have sight of the Electoral Commission application. Wonder who produced it?

There is going to be a very big spotlight shone on the Electoral Commission's decision. Even after a the briefest of scrutiny there is the suspicion of a stitch-up. Once the rest of the evidence comes to light I am sure that there will be even more intense media scrutiny. BBC Asian Network are now looking very closely at the 'Have Your Say' information leaflet, so it will only be a matter of time before the big penny drops. However, as three of the Electoral Commissioners have BBC connections it may need to be an independent source that uncovers 'The Anatomy of A Stitch up.'

Rather amusing to see in the NESNO analysis, based on European Election results, Herron would end up with a position on the Assembly...another reason to vote No!

No comments:

Blog Archive


only search Neil Herron Blog