Judge exposes EU Criminal record problem

I do believe that this is called synchronicity!

The penny is starting drop, and this will be the straw that breaks the camel's back.

The politicians have created a country called Europe without ever gaining the consent of the people. The practicalities of living as one country means the day to day stuff must fit together and now we are reaching the Project's end game the harsh reality that the dream is unachievable is beginning to strike home.

If the Judge in the breaking story below had had a moment's reflection when he called for an EU wide criminal records system he would have realised that without borders, a single Police force, a common language and set of ideals, morals and principles, a common set of laws and criminal justice system, and one government then it would be impossible to achieve ... cat out of the bag yet?

Do we really want to wait until Lithuania's criminal records systems are on a par with ours before we are safe?

No other country in the EU has a Sex Offenders Register that parallels ours, and many have no such register.

EU Man (or woman) can walk out of prison in their home country, pick up a bag and travel freely wherever they like ... with an ID Card or passport ... and we are aware that there is a massive black market in those two commodities.

Are we to wait until there is a series of child murders by a citizen from an EU Member State by a paedophile who has been released from a prison after a ten year term who simply walked into this country through passport control with a bag of tools and a suitcase? The Police's job is difficult enough after the latest Home Office clanger without having the massive problem of not being able to access the criminal records of any one of the 665,000+ who have registered for work legally after moving from one of the 26 other Member States.

Consider this:
Serial killer on the loose. Five bodies found. Police check records of known offenders in the area. Police records checked, known offenders in the area are checked, there is a match, evidence is gathered and someone is arrested. It could also be that someone is stopped for an unrelated matter ... perhaps by a Traffic Cop for having a tail light out. Vehicle Reg checked with DVLA data base. Records are checked with the Police data base. Name recorded. Body found next day man arrested.

Consider if that man was a paedophile from an EU Member State without any ID driving a car with foreign plates. Would he be arrested for having a tail light out? (has he ever been pursued for a parking ticket or speeding fine ... trouble free parking and trouble free driving?). There is no requirement for him to produce any ID roadside...and why? Nothing suspicious about a broken tail light to justify an arrest. Body found next day. ... now what did that man look like? What did he say his name was? Where do we check that car registration number?

The practicalities of functioning as a country do not mix with the free movement of people agreed by EU treaties. The madness of this greatest ever of political deceptions will be the practicalities that make normal civic society function.

Game over John Reid. There are no excuses you can come up that will that will fool us.

The Home Office knew of the potential consequences yet agreed without a whimper to allow unfettered access after May 1st 2004 (and the predictions of 13,500 migrant workers a year show how out of touch you guys really are)
Home Office Consultation Paper on the Review of Part 1 of the Sex Offenders Act 1997: here ...
"the free movement of citizens within the EU adds a further layer of complexity. Passport controls on EU citizens entering the UK are now minimal.""Where it was known that they (a convicted sex offender) had committed a serious sex offence, they could, depending on the serious nature of the offence, be refused entry but this would be more difficult in the case of citizens of EU countries, who do not need to complete landing cards before entry."

You all buried your heads in the sand Mr. Reid...and you continue to do so.

Your primary concern as Home Secretary is to guarantee the safety and security of the citizens in this country. You and your Government can give no such guarantee.

We want a referendum on raising our borders again Mr. Reid and the strict and secure border controls that come with it.

We want to welcome with open arms those fellow Europeans who wish to live and work amongst us and contribute to our ecenomy and society.
We want to know that the people who we wish to welcome into our country can enjoy the same peace and security that we expect from those tasked with that responsibility.
But most of all we demand to know that we have not imported rapists, criminals and paedophiles to work and live alongside us without ever asking the questions before they were allowed in.

We want you to do as we say ... you have given away our country without our consent. We want it back

Judge calls for EU criminal records system
Richard Ford,
Home Correspondent
The Times January 13th 2007

Lithuanian gang jailed for 32 years

'Countries must share information'

A judge called yesterday for an EU-wide criminal record system after warning of serious difficulties in getting accurate information on the previous crimes of foreign offenders.
Judge Stephen Robbins said that it was a “matter of pubic concern” that the courts in England had difficulty receiving details of convictions from foreign states.

He said that the process of checking previous convictions on two Lithuanians convicted of gun-running had shown how “very difficult it was to glean details, let alone precise details” from their home country.

The judge said: “We know there is much concern at the moment in the press about convictions of British nationals coming from abroad, but here we have nationals from a country that has recently joined the EU . . . and who are free to visit Britain.”

More