The e-mail below was the press statement issued by Sunderland following the exposure of the fact that they were using imperial measures in their Traffic Regulation Orders thereby breaching the same Metrication Directive as the Metric Martyrs.
It was sent to Captain Green by Council Official Kevin Douglas.
It is quite clear from guidance issued by the DTI that imperial measures are not to be used for official documents ... but yet again, Sunderland has one law for the public and one law for themselves.
Subject: Press statement
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 16:22:13 -0000
Captain Green - information as requested.
Press response.
Regards - Kevin Douglas
Mr Herron's claims that certain areas of the city are being targeted are completely untrue.
The Consolidation Orders made in 2003 were precisely that. They did not introduce fresh restrictions but consolidated many traffic regulation orders - some of which were made many years earlier and referred to imperial measurements.
The road markings are consistent with the Order. Therefore the motorist would not be misled as to the nature of the restrictions imposed.
As in the case of all penalty charge notices motorists who believe their penalty charge notice should not be enforced can take it to appeal should they chose to do so.
As we have made clear, over the last 18 months all aspects of the decriminalised parking enforcement regime have been reviewed openly and transparently and this process continues.
Indeed, due to the nature of parking this process of checking and monitoring will continue.
Sunderland City Council accept no liability for and shall not be legally bound by the contents of this E-Mail. No assurances are given as to the authority of the sender to act on its behalf.Please note that the content of e-mail sent and received may have to be disclosed by the Council in response to a request for access to information.
Friday, November 03, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(392)
-
▼
November
(49)
- Another fine mess
- Chauffeur’s fury over £150 BP parking fine ... Civ...
- Fined driver takes on council and wins ... another...
- The fine mess continues ... now Redcar and Clevela...
- Now there are spy cameras at rubbish tips
- Sunderland Labour Group Letter that launched the n...
- BBC Reports Sunderland Labour Sleaze Row
- Opportunity for the Leader of Sunderland City Coun...
- Labour in fresh party funding row
- Sleazy Labour's £2m raid on council tax funds ... ...
- Same feet on traffic beat
- Chippy smells of chips complaint
- Off the streets
- Another fine mess .... more rubbish
- BBC Inside Out programme goes national
- NCP may lose some city parking duties
- Assembly on the move - but of its own accord
- Driver Gets Tickets as He Tries to Save His Dying ...
- Cost of Regional Assemblies risen from £5 million ...
- Daniel Mumford ... Victory against Southampton Cou...
- Shadow Tyneside Minister confirms that regional as...
- Parking protest suffers setback ... or has NPAS wa...
- Have your say on political funding
- Councillor faces party rap for snubbing campaign levy
- Blackpool FOI response
- Westminster Council ... Local Government Ombudsman...
- Workplace parking charges scheme may set precedent...
- Coronation Street saga continues
- Robin de Crittenden Skeleton Argument submitted to...
- Doctor makes a stand against parking fines
- The Parking Alternatives ...
- Mexican Stand Off in Sunderland
- Sunderland Council's NCP Parking Attendants' silence
- Dacorum Council put on notice...another parking fi...
- And another (Dacorum Borough Council) one's gone ....
- Dacorum decision ... another council bites the roa...
- Parking in Southampton ... what a shambles!
- Parking Attendant's Blog
- And another one's gone (Tendring District Council)
- Another One (Ealing Council) Bites the Dust ...
- The Letters Page (Sunderland Echo)
- Sunderland Council Press Statement ... Imperial Me...
- Tories fail to clamp transport leader
- Who has parked their yard on my car?
- Joe keeps parking job
- Thanks
- Another fine mess for parking bosses
- North East Regional Assembly ... the real con
- Carmarthen Journal
-
▼
November
(49)
1 comment:
Since "no assurances are given as to the authority of the sender", what is the point of this email?
Post a Comment