27 hours and counting...Yes Campaign still silent on Misleading leaflet

These were the questions asked of the official Yes and No Campaigns about the factually incorrect and misleading statements in the Government's 'Have Your Say' Leaflet.

The Yes campaign remain silent. We are hopeful for a response. A telephone call to their office at 4pm on 22nd September brought the response, "I will ask aroud the office and ring you back."

The North East Says No's response from their Chairman John Elliott can be seen by clicking the link here.

Professor John Tomaney
Chairman
Yes4theNorthEastDurham

12.30pm 21st September 2004

Dear John,

We are preparing a case for Judicial Review which will be lodged by the end of the week at the Royal Courts of Justice.

We feel as though the referendum issue and the implications for the North East public are too important to be decided without correction of the misleading / factually incorrect statements which appear in the Government's 'Have Your Say' Leaflet which went out to 1,900,000 people in the region.

The ODPM is currently considering writing to only a proportion of the North East public over the incorrect figure involved in the local government reorganisation in Durham.

I have also indicated the other 'misleading statements,' which will form part of the case. See below...
Have Your Say
"They (the assembly members) would be elected - as in Scotland, Wales and London - by a system of proportional representation to help prevent domination by a single political party..."
However...
The Draft Regional Assemblies Bill
"A number of members (constituency members) would be elected for constituencies on the traditional 'first past the post' method. The rest would be elected on a regionwide basis, as 'top-up members.'...it is expected that the constituency members would make up the majority."

Have Your Say
"The North East Regional Development Agency, for example, would answer not to Ministers or Whitehall but to the assembly."
Draft Regional Assemblies Bill Policy Statement (Section 43)
"Central government would retain powers to ensure that assemblies and their RDA's continue to address national priorities.For example, the assembly would need to consult the Government on the draft regional economic strategy and on Board appointments."

I would appreciate answers to the following questions within 24 hours from the Yes (and also the 'No') Campaign because it is important that the North East are fully aware of exactly where the two official campaigns stand:-

1. Do the feel that the two above statements from the Have Your Say Leaflet are misleading?

2. Would you be happy for the statements to be withdrawn or corrected, or would you prefer them to remain unchallenged?

3. Are you happy that the incorrect figure describing the cost of local government reorganisation for Durham is not being corrected for the whole of the 1,900,000 voters?

4. Do you think that the importance of ensuring tthat the public are fully and correctly informed outweighs the cost of correcting the mistakes?

5. Are you content that the photographs used in the 'Have Your Say' Leaflet and the use of negative imagery including using racial stereotypes should also be allowed to stand?

Neil Herron
North East No Campaign
Frederick Street
Sunderland
Tel. 0191 565 7143
Mob. 07776 202045


Also to John Elliott,Chairman,North East Says No

cc. Ross Smith / Zoe Hughes (Journal)
cc. Philip Johnston (Daily Telegraph)
cc. Peter Young (Evening Chronicle)
cc. Tony Kearney (Northern Echo)
cc. Jeremy Wicking (Sunderland Echo)
cc. Peter Hetherington (Guardian)
cc. Steve Dyson (Middlesbrough Evening Gazette)
cc. Richard Moss (BBC)
cc. Tiffany Royce (Tyne Tees)