Cabinet Office : Introduction Management Unit Organisation Chart
Guidance on the work of the
Government Information Service - Annex A
Government Publicity and Advertising
1 . This note sets out and provides guidance on the conventions which successive Governments have applied to their advertising and paid or unpaid publicity.
Propriety - Basic Conventions
2. The main conventions require that Government publicity:
i. should be relevant to Government responsibilities;
ii. should be objective and explanatory, not tendentious or polemical;
iii. should not be, or be liable to misrepresentation as being, party political; and
iv. should be conducted in an economic and appropriate way, having regard to the need to be able to justify the costs as expenditure of public funds.
General
3. These conventions continue to serve the Government and the public well. They are in general terms but have in practice provided an adequate basis for the exercise of judgement in individual cases. They are consistent with the principles set out in the new Civil Service Code, and complementary principles of Ministerial conduct, including the duty of Ministers to give Parliament and the public as full information as possible about the policies, decisions and actions of the Government, and not to deceive or knowingly mislead, and the duty not to use public resources for party-political purposes.
4. More detailed guidance on the application of the conventions to the main kinds of Government publicity is contained in the Guidance Note on the work of the Government Information Service, which also includes specific notes on Government use of public relations consultants, Government use of direct marketing, and value for money issues.
5. The conventions apply to both "paid" and "unpaid" publicity. "Paid" publicity includes paid advertising in the press, on radio and on television, government-produced or sponsored software and video material, leaflet campaigns, material placed on the Internet, exhibitions etc. "Unpaid" publicity includes papers presented to Parliament as White and Green Papers and other consultation documents which are sold to the public; press notices; public inquiry unit and other official briefing material (all of which may nevertheless involve some cost to public funds through Civil Service costs) and printed and other information which carries Government support but which may be paid for or sponsored by a third party.
6. Ministers and Heads of Department need to be on their guard against the dangers of inappropriate use of publicity. These can stem as much from context, treatment, style, tone and quality of presentation as from the actual text employed. Each of these will need to be examined. A publicity campaign, or individual components of it, needs to be closely scrutinised not only in detail but also for its overall effect. "Image building", whether explicit or implied, and whether of Government or Minister, is not acceptable. The test is whether a campaign, taken both as a whole and in part, can be justified as an effective response to a requirement to communicate with the public, or a particular section of it, on an issue of importance.
Paid Publicity
7. Departments, collectively, form a big purchasing group and as well as providing general information for the public, Government uses publicity to influence the social behaviour of individuals and businesses. It is right and proper for Government to use public funds and resources for publicity and advertising to explain their policies and to inform the public of the Government services available to them and of their rights and liabilities. These resources may not, however, be used to support publicity for party political purposes; this rule governs not only decisions about what may or may not be published but also the content, style and distribution of what is published. This basic rule covering all Government publicity and advertising has been accepted under successive Administrations.
Unsolicited Material
8. Distribution of unsolicited material must be carefully controlled. As a general rule, publicity touching on politically controversial issues should not reach members of the public unsolicited, except where the information clearly and directly affects their interests. The level of intrusion is highest for television, radio, newspaper and poster advertising and material delivered to people's homes, and lowest for material available only on request. The general rule is that leaflets etc may be issued:
a. in response to individual requests, or enclosed with replies to related correspondence; and
b. to organisations or individuals with a known interest or, with the organisation's agreement, in bulk for distribution at their own expense to their membership only.
Procedures
9. The responsibility for ensuring that the conventions on propriety are observed, and that value for money is being achieved, rests with Departments and in particular with departmental Ministers and Heads of Department. The principal source of advice to Ministers and Heads of Department in this field is the departmental Head of Information. Officials planning publicity or advertising campaigns should consult their Departmental Head of Information at the earliest stage and Heads of Department should ensure that the Head of Information always has sufficient opportunity to advise on proposals for paid publicity, as well as the departmental Finance Division.
10. If the departmental arrangements work well, the need for reference to central advice should be very limited. It is likely to arise in three distinct circumstances:
i. if a publicity proposal falls into a category where central reference is mandatory, as is at present the case for paid publicity in advance of legislative approval (see para 14);
ii. if a proposal is "novel or contentious" in expenditure terms, in which case reference to the Treasury would be expected under the rules in Government Accounting and the public expenditure conventions generally;
iii. where a Minister, Head of Department or Head of Information wanted a second opinion on the compatibility of a proposal with the current central guidance.
11. Departments will generally wish to seek professional advice on the most appropriate and effective ways of meeting their publicity objectives. Heads of Information are best placed to provide such advice, both directly and in consultation with the wide range of private sector specialists that they commission and manage. Heads of Information regularly exchange advice and experience with their opposite numbers in other Government Departments and, where necessary, consult the Central Office of Information.
12. The Treasury, and where necessary the Chief Secretary, Treasury, will continue to provide advice on value for money issues relating to Government publicity and advertising.
13. On matters of propriety, Departments should first turn to the Head of the Government Information Service. He/she will advise if the matter needs further consideration by the Machinery of Government and Standards Group, or the Head of the Home Civil Service.
14. Government publicity for proposals which are, or may become, the subject of legislation in Parliament remains a particularly sensitive area. Until such measures have become law, any Government publicity must neither assume nor anticipate Parliamentary approval. Ministers should therefore ensure that all proposals for paid publicity (including, for example, leaflets) about the contents of legislation in advance of Parliamentary approval, together with the proposed distribution of the material, are referred to the Secretary of the Cabinet and copied to the Minister for the Cabinet Office.
Sunday, September 19, 2004
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2004
(365)
-
▼
September
(96)
- Latest Poll...59% of Chronicle Readers Say No
- Press Release
- 'Foot in Mouth' disease flares up again
- Parents hold power balance Sep 30 2004 By Graeme W...
- Calls start coming in...from Conservatives
- Letter Writers Exposed...Undercover Elephants
- More rows in the Counties and Districts
- Letters exposing misrepresentation cover the region
- NECC Poll rattles Yes Campaign into desperatesville
- More evidence of a stitch up
- Today's Letters
- NESNO Say No
- Journal Letters
- Assembly proposals 'half-baked' Sep 24 2004 By Eve...
- Sunday Telegraph Letters Date: 26 September 2004 ...
- North East's Biggest City Says No
- More bad news for Yes
- Prescott now exposed as desperate
- The full press release from NECC
- Northern Echo Business bosses reject N-E assembly ...
- Another nail in the Yes Campaign coffin
- National Coverage as stakes get higher
- Judicial Review Papers Lodged
- Liberal Party Chairman calls for a No vote
- Tony Blair and Gordon Brown unite to say 'No'
- Yes Campaign kicked again by business
- ...while the official campaign sat on its hands
- North East Small Business not impressed with Presc...
- No Campaign takes the Deputy Prime Minister to Hig...
- Newcastle Evening Chronicle
- Today's Letters
- What price information? What price democracy?
- Lib Dems Say Government "Fumbled" and "stuttered"
- Northern Echo 23rd September... Councils take Lega...
- Regional Organisers Letters
- Sunderland Echo News 23rd September
- NESNO gets a headline! Well done.
- Moe correspondence from the public
- Audit Commission adds nothing ;-)
- ODPM Ask for more time
- High noon for Raynsford
- We want answers from the Electoral Commission, not...
- North East Says No Campaign Responds to the Questi...
- 27 hours and counting...Yes Campaign still silent ...
- More Letters...tidal wave grows
- Emergency Meetings in the Electoral Commission
- Ante Raised...Court case looms
- What are the Tories saying No to, and are they say...
- Spotlight getting brighter...Electoral Commssion g...
- Public waking up to the stitch-up
- Conspiracy over Stitch-up Grows
- 24 Hours and Counting
- Complaints start going in to the Electoral Commission
- Stakes raised and ODPM on the back foot
- Electoral Commission catch 'Foot in Mouth'
- 'Foot in Mouth' Epidemic Spreads
- 'Foot in Mouth' outbreak in North East
- Liberals attack Electoral Commission decision
- Prescott Looking for a Court Appearance
- Legal Challenge...Complaint to the Electoral Commi...
- Legal Challenge...Complaint to ODPM
- The Legal Challenge...Audit Commission Complaint
- The Rigging of a Referendum
- The Electoral Commissioners
- As more worms leave the tin
- NESNO walking into punch after punch
- Conspiracy over designation grows
- Shambles now about to become absolute chaos
- Undecided? Yes or No? More champagne Sir?
- Discredited Electoral Commission and the Betrayal ...
- Another Cock-up by the now discredited Electoral C...
- Just to Refresh you
- Electoral Commission about to be discredited?
- Who knew NESNO were the No Campaign?
- Mallon Ponders Role In Assembly
- Constituencies Decided ...after a Yes vote
- What have they done? Its now Conservative vs Labour
- Electoral Commission Decides
- Rural Communities uncertain over benefits of an As...
- Cross and Non Party Coalition
- More Outrageous claims by Prescott
- There is nothing like a dose of self-interest to s...
- Recent Letters
- Regional Assemblies entering their twilight years....
- "Me? A cynic? Is it not obvious?"
- "We are giving you a referendum you never asked fo...
- A Collection of Recent Letters
- Prescott's Propaganda Challenged
- Whoops they did it again! BBC use Labour Politicia...
- Prescott running scared
- Well Done John Taylor, Leader of Alnwick Council
- What was \the question?
- Bottled Fog Sellers Lose out to Free Bread
- Tidal Wave of opposition
- Simply ask the question..."Why does there need to ...
- Spotlight getting brighter on this outrageous frau...
-
▼
September
(96)
No comments:
Post a Comment