Campaigner warns of £380,000 legal bill
The Journal
Thursday March 9, 2006
by Ross Smith
More than 12,000 flawed parking tickets were issued by a North council after it was told they must include the date of issue, The Journal can reveal today.
Sunderland Council on Tuesday said it was writing off fines for motorists who had not yet paid up on tickets with no date of issue - but would not refund those who did pay.
It is refunding 46 drivers who paid tickets after the council says it received "legal advice" on the matter on November 25.
But the council admitted yesterday NCP, which handles its parking enforcement, handed out 12,761 tickets between May and November with no date of issue - after it had been made aware of the problem. Campaigner Neil Herron last night said the decision not to refund fines on these tickets will "undoubtedly" be tested in court - potentially landing the council with a £380,000 bill.
Sunderland Council was told by the National Parking Adudication Service on May 4 last year of a case in Bury, Greater Manchester, in which it was ruled that tickets must carry a date of issue.
Council transport chiefs asked the assistant city solicitor on May 16 to comment on this - but 12,761 tickets without a date were still issued after this point. On June 14, the assistant city solicitor recommended the tickets should be changed "without delay". However, this was not carried out until November.
Yesterday, a pensioner who has paid two fines for tickets which did not include a date of issue said the decision not to refund them was "unbelievable".
Sarah Lapping, 73, of Westray Close, Sunderland, said: "I paid the fines straightaway because I thought I had done something wrong.
"But I think it's wrong that people who did not pay can now get away with it, while I can't have my money back. I wouldn't mind if they were going to make everybody pay, but it seems there are different rules for different people."
A letter to Mrs Lapping from council director of development and regeneration Phil Barrett said the lack of a date on a ticket means a penalty charge notice is "capable of being successfully appealed against, if such action was taken at the relevant time", but this does not make it "void".
Mr Herron said: "I think a recommendation from a solicitor can be considered legal advice and the advice in June was quite clear: include the date of issue without delay. Why did they not see the urgency to do this until November?"
Sunderland has acted faster than other authorities across the country to issue refunds over undated tickets, and Mr Herron said: "Because Sunderland have done this, there's going to be panic stations right across the country."
Last night, Sunderland Council would only say: "Mrs Lapping paid her penalty charge because she had been parking illegally."
Thursday, March 09, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(392)
-
▼
March
(55)
- Sunderland Councillor Dave Allen says "Herron is f...
- Department for Transport Consultation ... Data Rel...
- Herron on BBC Culture Show...7.30pm and 11.20pm
- Newcastle Council Leader Upset...
- Salisbury: Parking enforcement `will never be popu...
- Press Release: Prescott's Department says he got i...
- Arrogant Prescott ignores scathing regions report
- North East Assembly leader, Alex Watson breaches C...
- Labour Councillors vote with the Tories...oops!
- Third suspension at Sunderland Magistrates' court
- "There is no England," says Newcastle City Council...
- Another Invite to Robocop Mayor
- DVLA Data Release Consultation
- Decriminalised Parking Enforcement across the coun...
- Council Tax Pensioners Told by Court "Pay up or Le...
- Get your own house in order first
- Pride not Prejudice
- We're in the clear on parking, say council
- The law is the law
- Now Parking Ticket 'credits' in Sunderland
- Elected Mayor 'Robocop' Ray Mallon and those tickets
- Association of London Government to give Parking T...
- Shambolic council parking fiasco
- 12,761 'unlawful' parking tickets issued
- Association of Local Government Desperately defend...
- Alan Parker v Transport for London
- CSA and Sandy Rham
- Anger as unpaid fines are scrubbed
- Refunds after new parking blunder
- Parking chiefs to pay out more refunds
- Jag driver refuses to tow the line over fine
- Sunderland and NCP knew about the MacArthur v Bury...
- Parking Ticket Mass Amnesty? ... Local authorities...
- Sunderland Council says yes but no but
- Motorist fined for turning in car park
- It's not just the streets that have no names...its...
- Fined with an unlawful ticket on a street with no ...
- Do police "No waiting" zones have any legal force?
- Action now in Stoke...Early Day Motion proposed
- Credit where it is due ... a Parking Attendant tha...
- Bill of Rights test in the small claims court
- Barnet Council fights back ... but they lost and i...
- Irish road metrication - A warning for us
- New Welsh Ass £65m building launch ...a success?
- Corruption, cover-ups and the Committee of the Reg...
- Mile vs Kilometre ... Various Poll Results
- European Commission sidesteps question on Metric M...
- A Pandora's Box of Fixed Penalties
- Mile Poll Still running ... please vote
- Radio 1 Listeners ...'The Metric Generation' kick ...
- Blair squirms uncomfortably ... "You dropped me in...
- 'Miles Ahead, Kilometres Behind'
- BBC Watchdog now on the case of private parking sc...
- Some would call it propaganda...how about it Margo...
- From the Dirty White Van Man...
-
▼
March
(55)
4 comments:
Sunderland council: "Mrs Lapping paid her penalty charge because she had been parking illegally."
Wheras, Sunderland council does something illegal but are trying to get off scot free.
If it is good for Mrs Lapping, it is good for Sunderland council.
i have just stumbled across your blog entirely by accident.
my god you are an angry little man aren't you!!!
Not angry at all ... just determined.
A letter to Mrs Lapping from council director of development and regeneration Phil Barrett said the lack of a date on a ticket means a penalty charge notice is "capable of being successfully appealed against, if such action was taken at the relevant time", but this does not make it "void".
So an appeal will succeed because the PCN is not valid, but the council/NCP are free to use an invalid PCN to extort money from the public? I hope not.
And now the public realise they have been duped, the council/NCP try to avoid being brought to account by threatening to use public money to defend any legal actions brought by members of the public who seek refunds of monies paid after being knowingly misled by the council/NCP.
Post a Comment