Just received news of this victory from Mike Garrod and raises some important points.
In July 2005 I parked on a section of road in Ipswich where unlimited parking was allowed. On return to the vehicle I found a £30 fixed penalty notice had been place on the vehicle. I sent the notice to Suffolk Constabulary, Central Ticket Office, advising them that the vehicle had been parked in an unrestricted section of road and requesting that the ticket should be withdrawn. They replied, refuting this as there were police "no waiting" cones in place. Not in my view. Friends and family advised me to pay up as I would not win against the authority.
A summons was issued against me, alleging that I had offended
i) Ipswich Borough Council (Waiting and Unloading Restrictions)(Amendment Order 2004-3) and
ii) Section 11 Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 and
iii) Section 5 of Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984. This was before parking in Ipswich was "decriminalised", which happened some three weeks later. There would also be a minimum claim of £35 for costs.
I requested a copy of the Ipswich Borough Council Act, which they kindly supplied. The Act confirmed that waiting was allowed in that section of road, but there was no mention of police "no waiting" cones. Similarly, a study of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, sections 11 & 5, showed no mention of "no waiting" cones. There was also no mention of the cones in the statement of facts accompanying the summons, which was pointed out to me by the Legal Adviser of Ipswich Magistrates Court.
After two postponements of the court case and further correspondence, I requested to be advised where, in the Acts quoted, police "no waiting" cones are mentioned.
I also provided photographic evidence of the parking place, with correct white lines on the road..
There were several clerical errors in the paperwork served on me which I pointed out to the court, e.g., I was given fourteen days to reply to an undated letter from the Crown Prosecutor.
The court case was due at 10 am on Monday 20 February. At 3 pm on the previous Friday I received a very blunt telephone call from the Crown Prosecutor who advised that I would be receiving a Letter of Discontinuation of the case. It had been dropped! The letter stated that "The decision to discontinue these charges has been taken because there is insufficient evidence to provide a realistic prospect of conviction". And I was allowed to claim any reasonable costs incurred in respect of the proceedings, which I felt duty bound to do.
So, a win over both Ipswich Borough Council for an unlawful fixed penalty charge and also over the Crown Prosecution Service. Oi larfed moyself silly.
I am advised from an inside source that the traffic warden and his senior are not happy bunnies at the case being withdrawn. What can one say.
The question still remains: - do police "no waiting" cones have any legal force?.
If Ipswich Borough Council and The Crown Prosecution Service had proceeded with the case and it had been established that police "no waiting" cones are merely advisory, how many motorists would be in a position to reclaim unlawful fines?
Although you may not have been able to help directly in this case, your success in other cases, mainly in the decriminalised regime, gave impetus to pursue this to the end.
Mike Garrod
Monday, March 06, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(392)
-
▼
March
(55)
- Sunderland Councillor Dave Allen says "Herron is f...
- Department for Transport Consultation ... Data Rel...
- Herron on BBC Culture Show...7.30pm and 11.20pm
- Newcastle Council Leader Upset...
- Salisbury: Parking enforcement `will never be popu...
- Press Release: Prescott's Department says he got i...
- Arrogant Prescott ignores scathing regions report
- North East Assembly leader, Alex Watson breaches C...
- Labour Councillors vote with the Tories...oops!
- Third suspension at Sunderland Magistrates' court
- "There is no England," says Newcastle City Council...
- Another Invite to Robocop Mayor
- DVLA Data Release Consultation
- Decriminalised Parking Enforcement across the coun...
- Council Tax Pensioners Told by Court "Pay up or Le...
- Get your own house in order first
- Pride not Prejudice
- We're in the clear on parking, say council
- The law is the law
- Now Parking Ticket 'credits' in Sunderland
- Elected Mayor 'Robocop' Ray Mallon and those tickets
- Association of London Government to give Parking T...
- Shambolic council parking fiasco
- 12,761 'unlawful' parking tickets issued
- Association of Local Government Desperately defend...
- Alan Parker v Transport for London
- CSA and Sandy Rham
- Anger as unpaid fines are scrubbed
- Refunds after new parking blunder
- Parking chiefs to pay out more refunds
- Jag driver refuses to tow the line over fine
- Sunderland and NCP knew about the MacArthur v Bury...
- Parking Ticket Mass Amnesty? ... Local authorities...
- Sunderland Council says yes but no but
- Motorist fined for turning in car park
- It's not just the streets that have no names...its...
- Fined with an unlawful ticket on a street with no ...
- Do police "No waiting" zones have any legal force?
- Action now in Stoke...Early Day Motion proposed
- Credit where it is due ... a Parking Attendant tha...
- Bill of Rights test in the small claims court
- Barnet Council fights back ... but they lost and i...
- Irish road metrication - A warning for us
- New Welsh Ass £65m building launch ...a success?
- Corruption, cover-ups and the Committee of the Reg...
- Mile vs Kilometre ... Various Poll Results
- European Commission sidesteps question on Metric M...
- A Pandora's Box of Fixed Penalties
- Mile Poll Still running ... please vote
- Radio 1 Listeners ...'The Metric Generation' kick ...
- Blair squirms uncomfortably ... "You dropped me in...
- 'Miles Ahead, Kilometres Behind'
- BBC Watchdog now on the case of private parking sc...
- Some would call it propaganda...how about it Margo...
- From the Dirty White Van Man...
-
▼
March
(55)
3 comments:
In short, the Police have NO authority within decriminalised zones. They can only issue a ticket for causing an obstruction which they would have to prove in court and a bay would not constitute an obstruction. They have no juristiction within an SPA.
In short, you cooked em well and good my friend.
Taken from information provided for a DPE in the UK....
"The Police will not be responsible for enforcing any permanent waiting, loading or parking restrictions. They will still enforce some temporary waiting restrictions such as areas marked with “police no waiting” cones, at special events, e.g. football matches etc.
The enforcement of moving vehicle offences and those Parking offences that carry penalty points will remain the responsibility of the police. In addition they will continue to issue parking tickets for temporary waiting restrictions (shown by kerb side waiting restriction cones).
The Police will continue to issue parking tickets for parking on pedestrian crossing zig-zags as this offence also carries penalty points.
Keeping footways clear where there are no parking restrictions will remain the responsibility of the Police.
The Police will also continue to deal with obstruction and all moving traffic offences and can take action against any vehicle where security or other traffic policing issues are involved."
Therefore, no waiting cones can be enforced by the Police
I appreciate your points but just because it is in information provided for a DPE does not make it law, where are Police No Waiting cones mentioned in any Act? It appears from the original story that they are not mentioned.
Post a Comment