Hunts Post
NEWS
Walters' World
24 Nov 2004 16:39
REGIONALISM RIP
HOW delighted I was to read the result of the Regional Assemblies referendum in the North East. There can be no argument about how comprehensively the people rejected Mr Prescott's dream. And this was in the region thought to be most amenable to the idea.
With a turnout above 40 per cent and a 78 per cent vote against, it is impossible for anyone to claim that apathy ruled the day and lost the battle.
Our region (The East of England) was already right at the bottom of the Government's hit list for directly elected regional assemblies; so I hope the idea will quietly be forgotten.The result gave rise to some correspondence. I have received a mass of letters asking why we have a regional assembly in the East without having had a referendum. I thought it might be useful to explain.
We originally formed The East of England Local Government Conference covering the six counties of this region.It allowed local authorities in the region to get together to look at things appropriate in a regional context. Its members were not directly elected; but they were all elected members of local authorities.
The Government was so convinced that directly elected regional assemblies would soon be the norm, that it designated our alternative, voluntary, chamber as "The Regional Planning Body" for the East of England - the body that would make planning decisions for pan-regional items.
However, it also passed legislation making it compulsory for "at least 30 per cent" of the assembly places to be held by "stakeholders." Stakeholders are not elected (either to a local authority or to the voluntary chamber).
They are appointed.Exactly who decides which "stakeholder organisations" get a seat (and how that seat is allocated to a specific individual) is amystery to me. I am sure there is a piece of paper somewhere that explains it.
At the same time, the Government insisted that we changed the name of the chamber to The East of England Regional Assembly (EERA).That is the body which, earlier this month, accepted the need for 478,000 new homes in the region between 2001 and 2021.
Many of the letters I received complained that EERA is an "unelected QUANGO" and has no democratic mandate to make that sort of decision. To a certain extent they are right; the stakeholder representatives have no democratic mandate. But all the local authority members do - and all local authorities in the region are represented.I am the Cambridgeshire representative. I am a democratically elected county councillor and the rest of that number elected me to represent them at EERA.I claim, therefore, to have a democratic mandate.
However, as the Government's dreams recede, perhaps we should ask them to re-examine the democratic justification for allowing stakeholders to be voting members on regional planning issues.I suspect that we will get a frosty response; for the system would now require primary legislation to change it back to the Local Government Conference model. But it would be nice to watch them squirm as they explain how their placemen supposedly make good the previous democratic deficit.
Saturday, November 27, 2004
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2004
(365)
-
▼
November
(86)
- The real criminals
- ...from an East of England Assembly member
- Grim Reaper spotted on Newcastle Quayside...will t...
- Epping Guardian...the clans are gathering...
- North East Assembly employees frantically check th...
- 'Smokescreen for his failures'...oh Mr. Younger!
- Order Your Copy of the European Constitution
- PERLEEEASE! Mr. Knapman, did you not blush?
- North East Assembly Members
- From the North East Assembly Website
- But will they withdraw funding?
- Show me the money!
- Director of the Assembly fails to answer the quest...
- Ooooh...Sticks and Stones!
- Can we go for a double on the next referendum?
- Now a personal view of Mr. Frayne's 'personal view.'
- It was a racing certainty from day one
- Complaint to the Audit Commission...Ministerial Vi...
- Just what we expected...
- Keeping the pressure on...
- Contemptuous arrogance of the Government over asse...
- Answers required from the North East Assembly Dire...
- Our Wonderful North East Assembly
- Spotlight will keep shining on North East MP's
- Net closing. Assembly staff should start scanning ...
- Less talk and more action...we are waiting.
- A Bonfire? We have just the Guy.
- Prescott still doesn't get it!
- Observations from abroad
- Kick Ass and Kill Bill...Haskins admits idea is fi...
- The beginning of the end for regions?
- The academics got it wrong as well...
- One of over a thousand!
- The Suspects...paid for by you and I. How long wil...
- Prescott in Drag? An Assembly in disguise.
- BBC and an Assembly agenda? Surely not
- Northern Echo Round-up
- "Stick your ******* Barnett Formula"
- Europe of the Regions...Not here mate! Booker in t...
- BBC Coverage...Suits you, Sir? Funny Guy tho'.
- Will Prescott Survive this?
- Yorkshire Vote? Statements of punch drunk Ministers
- Raynsford and Prescott tainted forever
- Nice one my Sun
- MP Calls for referendums to scrap Scottish Parliam...
- The 'confusion' of politicians during the campaign...
- Awesome! But Mummy, "What is that man for?"
- No to Politicians...a new dawn?
- The Times...Plan C?
- A debt of Gratitude? The pleasure was all ours, Sir.
- ...let's see what the Conservatives are made of. S...
- ...and his face looks well slapped!
- Penny For The Guy...Bonfire Special
- Pressure Grows on unelected assemblies...Prescott'...
- The attacks start on the unelected Assemblies...fo...
- Press Release: "The People Have Spoken"
- Congratulations start to flood in to the real camp...
- Result from the North East...the People have spoken
- The people speak
- Our democracy is precious...Electoral Commission w...
- Today's News Bulletin
- And now another mention in Hansard...
- When a No vote is achieved then the unelected Asse...
- Prescott's Job on the line when his 'pet' dies
- No Letters in the Papers...
- Three Parties agree on something!
- A No vote is the beginning, not the end.
- Kennedy... "Blame Blair for the defeat."
- The final countdown...
- Letters to the Times
- Oh Mr. Anderson...and we thought you were a gastro...
- Labour fight Labour...amazing what a dose of self-...
- Recent Letters...
- Bloated white elephant deflated...no hot air left!
- The Market Trader and the Businessman face down th...
- Prescott take notice of purdah? Electoral Commissi...
- Scottish drum banged with wet hankies in the North...
- Sunderland Still Says No...even as the goalposts move
- Middlesbrough ignores Mallon this time as he insul...
- Too late to matter...most who will vote have voted!
- Prescott not quangos will end up on the bonfire
- "Scottish example great for No Campaign" says Neil...
- Daily Telegraph predicts No vote
- President of the Liberal Party attacks Yes Campaig...
- Ladbrokes frightened off by No Campaigners bet
- Referendum news round up... North East No Campaign
-
▼
November
(86)
1 comment:
Or we should re-examine the whole concept of "regional planning", except for matters that genuinely pertain to a larger geographical area than a county or city, which could accurately be characterised as a "region".
When should a councillor from Kent have a vote on what happens in Oxfordshire, and vice versa? If a councillor from as far away as Kent has a legitimate interest in whatever happens in Oxfordshire, and should be allowed to cast a vote, why then should councillors from the adjacent counties of Gloucestershire, Warwickshire and Northamptonshire be precluded from doing so?
It's all nonsense, from beginning to end. Unless you look at it from Brussels, when dividing up England into fewer, larger, units - "European Regions" - makes sense.
Post a Comment