Sunderland Still Says No...even as the goalposts move

Sunderland Echo
1st November
Assembly lacks necessary teeth
WHEN the idea of a Regional Assembly was first mooted, it sounded an attractive proposition.
However, when the Government finally got round to revealing the true nature of the proposed assembly, we were disappointed by the lack of real powers.
If an assembly is to work, it needs to be far more than a talking shop staffed by the same old faces.
The timidity of the current proposals surprised many who found themselves on the "no" side of the debate, despite approving of such a body in principle.
Yes campaigners argue the powers and responsibilites of the assembly would grow after it is established.
We still cannot give it our backing. We believe we should vote on what is on offer, not on what the assembly may become.
Today, the Lib Dems entered the fray threatening to halt the assembly bill unless its powers are increased.
They would use their "casting vote" in the Lords to scupper the bill if it did not include improved powers in the areas of transport and skills.
The Lib dems know the proposed assembly does not have the necessary teeth.
According to some in the Yes camp, the Government is willing to grant these extra powers.
Why then aren’t they already in the bill?
Are the goalposts moving, or has the assembly been undersold?