Sunday, November 28, 2004

The real criminals

Sunday Telegraph
Christopher Booker's Notebook
Sunday 28th November 2004

Who arrests the Prime Minister for this crime?
Did Tony Blair, Gordon Brown and John Prescott all recently commit a criminal offence? The promise in the Queen's Speech of a referendum on the EU constitution makes it all the more urgent to resolve an extraordinary anomaly which arose during the referendum on a regional assembly for the North-East.
Among high-profile campaigners for a Yes vote were Messrs Blair, Brown and Prescott, all of whom visited the North-East in the run-up to polling day.
Yet, as was pointed out by Neil Herron, the director of the "North-East No" campaign, the speeches and interviews by these ministers were in breach of the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act.
This makes it an offence for ministers to "publish" any material relevant to a referendum during the 28-day "purdah period" before polling day. Mr Herron has in his possession a letter from Ian Scotter of the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister stating that the term "publication", according to Treasury counsel, "also applies to speeches and press interviews".
A letter from one of Mr Scotter's colleagues states that "ministers are permitted to speak on the issues during the 'purdah period' if they make it clear that they are doing so in a personal or political capacity and not as a government minister".
Yet when these eminent politicians appeared in the North-East, they took no obvious steps to make clear that they were not speaking in their ministerial capacity, but only as the MPs for Sedgefield, Dunfermline and Hull East.
A series of parliamentary questions has now been tabled by Lord Stoddart of Swindon, asking the Government to confirm that these letters correctly interpret the law - and to make clear who is responsible for enforcing it.
The Electoral Commission disclaims any responsibility. Whose duty will it be, then, when Tony Blair appears on television as Prime Minister during the final days of the referendum on the European constitution, to tap him on the shoulder and say, "I am arresting you for a breach of the Act"?
It may seem ridiculous, but if politicians are allowed openly to break their own laws, does it not become a rather serious matter?

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Human Rights Act

First Protocol ARTICLE 3 RIGHT TO FREE ELECTIONS
The High Contracting Parties undertake to hold free elections at reasonable intervals by secret ballot, under conditions which will ensure the free expression of the opinion of the people in the choice of the legislature.

7. - (1) A person who claims that a public authority has acted (or proposes to act) in a way which is made unlawful by section 6(1) may-
 
  (a) bring proceedings against the authority under this Act in the appropriate court or tribunal, or
  (b) rely on the Convention right or rights concerned in any legal proceedings,
  but only if he is (or would be) a victim of the unlawful act.
 
6. - (1) It is unlawful for a public authority to act in a way which is incompatible with a Convention right.
 

11. A person's reliance on a Convention right does not restrict-
 
  (a) any other right or freedom conferred on him by or under any law having effect in any part of the United Kingdom

Anonymous said...

Purdah merely requires that, from the set date, the government not announce any NEW intiatives or legislation relevant to what's being voted on. It does not ban the publishing of any material altogether - otherwise, Britain would cease to function for a month in the run-up to every election.

Anonymous said...

Oh, you mean like this, Newcastle Journal Nov 2nd:

"Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott last night made an 11th hour bid for support for a regional assembly by claiming he had struck a deal to get the North-East equal powers to London on transport. Mr Prescott said he had reached agreement with Transport Secretary Alastair Darling on Friday to significantly beef up the powers given to an assembly under the upcoming Transport Bill."

Plus a picture of him speaking into a microphone in the street, in front of a Vote Yes placard.

You interpretation of 'purdah' is in any case wrong - it relates to any statements that might influence how people vote on the referendum question, or encourage them to vote, whether it's announcing a new initiative, or re-stating a previous initiative.

Anonymous said...

"I just came across your blog about **keyword** and wanted to drop you a note telling you how impressed I was with the information you have posted here. I also have a web site & blog about top 100 penny stock so I know what I'm talking about when I say your site is top-notch! Keep up the great work, you are providing a great resource on the Internet here!"

Blog Archive


only search Neil Herron Blog