House of Commons Speaker
On 21 July 1993,
the Speaker of the House of Commons issued the following statement:
"There has of course been no amendment to the Bill of Rights … the House is entitled to expect that the Bill of Rights will be fully respected by all those appearing before the courts"
(Hansard, 21 July 1993 column 352).
Let this serve as a reminder to those who try to infer that this is an old, out of date document. And a reminder of the wording of one section:
'that all grants and promises of fines and forfeitures of particular persons before conviction are illegal and void.'
And as Lord Justice Laws stated in the Supreme Court of Judicature 0n 18th February 2002 in handing down the Metric Martyrs Judgment, that some Acts are constitutional and therefore can only be repealed with 'express words.'
As the 1991 Road Traffic Act makes no express reference to the Bill of Rights it is difficult how any court can allow fines BEFORE conviction ... unless the Metric Martyrs Judgment is wrong.
Monday, February 13, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(392)
-
▼
February
(52)
- Metricate the Roads? Looks like Prescott is on the...
- Well Done BBC Look North's Colin Briggs
- Another Clanger ... they just keep on coming here ...
- Another Poll ... indulge yourself
- Pro Metric Metro newspaper attempts to distort pol...
- Council ordered to pay back parking tickets
- Herron on TalkSPORT
- Kinnockio in the Booker Column...now we know why h...
- Getting the hump
- Kinnock gets a treble up ... three non-runners!
- UKMA Run away from any debate
- DVLA Data Base and the £50m robbery
- Council Fists allegedly fly at NCP in Council Car ...
- Give these Jokers a millimetre and they'll take ou...
- Save Our Miles
- Why the switch to metric could be olympic task
- In praise of ... the mile
- Kinnock backs metric road signs
- Parking Probe Urged
- Metricate the roads ... get real!
- Metric Road Signs on Royal Estate
- Pass the Buck Darling ... Pressure mounts
- Department for Transport Response to Chris Mullin ...
- Road Signs to Go Metric in 5 years?
- Wallstrom urges propaganda in schools
- EU Flag. No plans to change guidance?
- Mayoral Referendum in Sunderland ... 10,615 and co...
- NPAS Annual Report
- Burnley Council ... formal letter incorporating th...
- Now Burnley...Parkwise again.
- EU Flag at Wear Vally DC...down for good.
- Mum's Parking Misery
- Calls for a Public Inquiry into the Sunderland Par...
- NPAS Submission - Payne v Mole Valley DC
- Looks like another batch of Parking Ticket refunds...
- What a Year! Fantastic! Leader of Sunderland Counc...
- Bill of Rights 1689 and Decriminalised Parking Fines
- The latest from the city of Sunderland Solicitor a...
- Are the questions too difficult Darling?
- Good practice?
- Desperate Tactics...
- Sunderland Echo Letters: Parking Tickets 'not lega...
- Council gets the hump
- Breaking point: the parking fightback
- Sunderland City Council ... nowhere left to turn? ...
- Sunderland Echo Letters: A personal agenda?
- Speed Humps, 20mph zones and more problems in Sund...
- Sunderland City Council and those outstanding ques...
- Blue Badge Holders wrongly ticketed. Millions shou...
- Report reveals catalogue of parking errors
- Sunderland Echo Letters: Sunderland's Parking Regi...
- Sunderland Council...good morning. There are many ...
-
▼
February
(52)
1 comment:
I was clamped by Westminster Council for parking in a residents bay in the middle of the night. My mistake was not checking that the time restrictions applying to the bay did not stop at 6.30pm as is usual in most areas in central London.
An appeal has been submitted to the Parking Appeals Service and my case is set to be heard in July. Do you think that I could use the Bill of Rights argument to support the appeal?
Many thanks.
Post a Comment