Another victory with massive implications. This one uncovered by Barrie Segal of www.appealnow.com
To read how this victory could cost councils millions click here
Monday, February 27, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
►
2009
(110)
-
►
December
(6)
- Will 2010 be the end of the offensive parking stea...
- "One rule for them and another for everyone else.....
- More flaws in St. Alban's Traffic Orders ... who c...
- Stop your stolen car dead in its tracks ...
- Another success and more refunds but ...
- Parking goldmine lures fat cat enforcer to Westmin...
-
►
September
(11)
- North Wales councils combine to combat poor parkin...
- Fined £472 for hospital parking
- Councillor jailed for bribery
- Motorists could be in line for parking fine refund...
- 'Credit card surcharge makes parking tickets illeg...
- Nearly half of parking tickets were unpaid
- Manchester City Council MUST refund all the money
- Are hundreds of Bournemouth parking fines set to b...
- Cheltenham fall foul of credit card ruling ... how...
- Parking ticket refunds ... councils consulting law...
- Another big parking High Court case set to expose ...
-
►
August
(23)
- The battle lines are being drawn ...
- Class actions. Why are we waiting?
- Days are numbered for lawless, uncontrolled local ...
- What next ... viewers of 'Murder she wrote' and Ta...
- Another step closer to the Royal Pardon...
- Where will the money come from to refund motorists...
- Credit Cards - Motorists could recoup driving fine...
- Credit-card surcharges for parking tickets to be r...
- One rule for them ...
- Patients fine ... Doctor fined
- Loophole in parking fines: Thousands of pounds cou...
- Motorcyclists are still revolting
- More refunds for Britain's motorists ... have you ...
- Baywatch at Rochdale's Car Parks ... more refunds
- Another victory as Camden caves in ... but beware ...
-
►
December
(6)
2 comments:
Unfortunately, he talks about a 'legal precident', that can only be the case if the 'tribunal' is in fact a legally constituted court of law.
And this is where they cannot have it both ways. The adjudicators claim to be a court of law ... therefore such decisions can be used as a precedent ... thereby calling into question fines issued by local authorities whose PCNs are unlawfully worded.
If they are not a court of law as they claim but a tribunal funded by one of the parties involved in the dispute then they are not independent. If that is the case then there iss no right of appeal to an independent body.
Bit of a rock and a hard place problem.
Post a Comment